task 2:the best time to learn a foreign language
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:10 am
Some people believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
A much debated issue these days is what the best time to acquire a foreign language. Some people believe that primary school is a brilliant choice, while other people argue secondary school is preferable. After a thorough consideration, I am in support of the former.
One of the main point is that exposure to language in early age has high efficiency. For one hand, children memorise knowledge quicker, albeit a huge amount of .Besides, ample time provide an excellent condition for them to have a good grasp of language skills. For another hand, it contributes to speak fluent foreign language on account of less examination, compared with secondary school. This means that they treat a foreign language as a communication tool rather than a subject.
Another reason is that learning language for a long period is a competitive advantage. This is to say they are able to develop English thinking, mother-tongue understanding, communicating flexibly with native speakers owing to fewer barriers. It is the appropriate talent that multinational corporation need desperately.
There is no denying that some people are concerned about severe brain drain. Students tend to informed about foreign culture resulting in an increasing number of people going abroad. Disappointingly, loads of people won’t return back their motherland. As I see it, there are alternatives to address the problem. Primary schools offer some course concerning traditional course to cultivate a sense of identity and pride to their own culture, reducing cultural assimilation.
In conclusion, despite some drawbacks of acquiring a foreign language in primary school, the advantages play a dominant role.
A much debated issue these days is what the best time to acquire a foreign language. Some people believe that primary school is a brilliant choice, while other people argue secondary school is preferable. After a thorough consideration, I am in support of the former.
One of the main point is that exposure to language in early age has high efficiency. For one hand, children memorise knowledge quicker, albeit a huge amount of .Besides, ample time provide an excellent condition for them to have a good grasp of language skills. For another hand, it contributes to speak fluent foreign language on account of less examination, compared with secondary school. This means that they treat a foreign language as a communication tool rather than a subject.
Another reason is that learning language for a long period is a competitive advantage. This is to say they are able to develop English thinking, mother-tongue understanding, communicating flexibly with native speakers owing to fewer barriers. It is the appropriate talent that multinational corporation need desperately.
There is no denying that some people are concerned about severe brain drain. Students tend to informed about foreign culture resulting in an increasing number of people going abroad. Disappointingly, loads of people won’t return back their motherland. As I see it, there are alternatives to address the problem. Primary schools offer some course concerning traditional course to cultivate a sense of identity and pride to their own culture, reducing cultural assimilation.
In conclusion, despite some drawbacks of acquiring a foreign language in primary school, the advantages play a dominant role.