Please comment on my essay
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:36 pm
Question :- In most developed countries the average life expectancy is constantly increasing. Discuss the positive and negative aspects of this trend.
Answer :- Age of common people ballooing with a fixed rate expecially in industrial countries. Whether, it is an advantatge or a disadvantage is always a matter of debate. I personally believe that it is a positive change. This essay will elobrate on both side of the argument.
First of all, keeping a person alive for long duration through medication should not be considered as a positive change in life expectancy of mankind. An exemplary example of this could be any human being surviving due to medical advancements which were not available in the distant past. Thus, helping someone to breath through medical equipments and live more years is not justifiable for increased life expectancy.
On the other hand, providing suitable environments in terms of hyginic food, pure water and fresh air would be a real achivement for mankind. Moreover, medical advancements and awareness are equally contributing towards this positive change and , indeed helping human being throughout the world to live a lond and disease-free life. It is quite clear that new people around the globe can enjoy their life more than ever before.
To Recapitulate, a life of hundreed years with disease and medicine would be a burden on the government and society. However, a healthy person with desirable persuite of happiness would contribute towards society and will be considered a positive change. Hence, a healthier, joyful and exuberant long life must be the only parameter to consider the increased life expectancy.
Answer :- Age of common people ballooing with a fixed rate expecially in industrial countries. Whether, it is an advantatge or a disadvantage is always a matter of debate. I personally believe that it is a positive change. This essay will elobrate on both side of the argument.
First of all, keeping a person alive for long duration through medication should not be considered as a positive change in life expectancy of mankind. An exemplary example of this could be any human being surviving due to medical advancements which were not available in the distant past. Thus, helping someone to breath through medical equipments and live more years is not justifiable for increased life expectancy.
On the other hand, providing suitable environments in terms of hyginic food, pure water and fresh air would be a real achivement for mankind. Moreover, medical advancements and awareness are equally contributing towards this positive change and , indeed helping human being throughout the world to live a lond and disease-free life. It is quite clear that new people around the globe can enjoy their life more than ever before.
To Recapitulate, a life of hundreed years with disease and medicine would be a burden on the government and society. However, a healthy person with desirable persuite of happiness would contribute towards society and will be considered a positive change. Hence, a healthier, joyful and exuberant long life must be the only parameter to consider the increased life expectancy.