Task 2 GT evaluation required
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2015 6:35 pm
Some people think an employee must make decisions, some argue that a manager ought to lead companies. Discuss both and tell your opinion.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
With the proliferation of high-tech environment, companies have altered their trends for development. This progress is due to internal strategies adapted by organisations. On the one hand, it is believed that companies are meant to excel if trust is put on employees in making decisions. However, most organizations still rely on managers' opinion because of their skill set and experience.
It is perceived that employees are most likely to take interest in their jobs if they own a responsibility. In this way, workers can be given a chance to showcase their talents and suggest productive solutions to the problems without any fear. For example, On spot decisions can predict the capability of an individual to bear stress and outshine among his peers. This example shows that workers if given an open ground, can prove whether they are worth making a decision for the goodwill of the company or not.
However, many people support the idea of relying on managers to lead a company. This can be perceived in two ways; first, Managers have sufficient experience that enable them to conclude matters precisely. Second, they are capable enough to train their subordinates and thus can prove to be helpful for setting an opinion for company's growth. This however, may hinder an individual's capability and as a consequence, both the company and personal growth might suffer.
After analyzing these two points of view, I believe that employees should be given an open hand to play their part in leading an organization under supervision. This will prove to be beneficial for personal and professional development in the market and can bring opportunities for individual to learn survival techniques from their colleagues and managers.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
With the proliferation of high-tech environment, companies have altered their trends for development. This progress is due to internal strategies adapted by organisations. On the one hand, it is believed that companies are meant to excel if trust is put on employees in making decisions. However, most organizations still rely on managers' opinion because of their skill set and experience.
It is perceived that employees are most likely to take interest in their jobs if they own a responsibility. In this way, workers can be given a chance to showcase their talents and suggest productive solutions to the problems without any fear. For example, On spot decisions can predict the capability of an individual to bear stress and outshine among his peers. This example shows that workers if given an open ground, can prove whether they are worth making a decision for the goodwill of the company or not.
However, many people support the idea of relying on managers to lead a company. This can be perceived in two ways; first, Managers have sufficient experience that enable them to conclude matters precisely. Second, they are capable enough to train their subordinates and thus can prove to be helpful for setting an opinion for company's growth. This however, may hinder an individual's capability and as a consequence, both the company and personal growth might suffer.
After analyzing these two points of view, I believe that employees should be given an open hand to play their part in leading an organization under supervision. This will prove to be beneficial for personal and professional development in the market and can bring opportunities for individual to learn survival techniques from their colleagues and managers.
