I will appreciate you if you help me
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:45 am
Hi everybody
I have exam on 12 july
Please help me in this essay
Although countries with long average working hours are economically successful, this often has some negative social consequences. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Obviously, the average of long working hours cannot be able to reduce due to the tremendous competition in global economy. However, I firmly believe that the length of working hours leads to negative social outcomes.
Undeniably, the cities with the longest working hours are economically advanced. Indeed, working long hours has developed the world economy. Not only the rate of the working hours has grown the countries economically, but financial rewards have also increased. For example, people who work long hours are often getting high salaries. As a result, the highest salaries could solve the most crucial issues such as the cost of living, rising prices, and even trying to live a stable life through facing difficult circumstances.
On the other hand, work long hours tend to affect negative social outcomes. Firstly, social relations of individuals who work extremely long hours are fewer than others who work normal hours. Certainly, workers have to spend their time with their colleagues, managers, and even traveling for business. Secondly, the average of working long hours has a tendency to reduce personal relationships such as staying with family for a long time or take care of children. For instance, parents who work for long periods of time are usually getting busy from their family life due to working long hours that may cause harmful health effects such as fatigue, sleep deprivation, and stress. Consequently, long hours working might be able to create negative social results.
To sum up, despite the fact that the countries which attempt to extend working hours have the highest global economy, people who work for a long time suffering from negative social consequences.
words (272)
I have exam on 12 july
Please help me in this essay
Although countries with long average working hours are economically successful, this often has some negative social consequences. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Obviously, the average of long working hours cannot be able to reduce due to the tremendous competition in global economy. However, I firmly believe that the length of working hours leads to negative social outcomes.
Undeniably, the cities with the longest working hours are economically advanced. Indeed, working long hours has developed the world economy. Not only the rate of the working hours has grown the countries economically, but financial rewards have also increased. For example, people who work long hours are often getting high salaries. As a result, the highest salaries could solve the most crucial issues such as the cost of living, rising prices, and even trying to live a stable life through facing difficult circumstances.
On the other hand, work long hours tend to affect negative social outcomes. Firstly, social relations of individuals who work extremely long hours are fewer than others who work normal hours. Certainly, workers have to spend their time with their colleagues, managers, and even traveling for business. Secondly, the average of working long hours has a tendency to reduce personal relationships such as staying with family for a long time or take care of children. For instance, parents who work for long periods of time are usually getting busy from their family life due to working long hours that may cause harmful health effects such as fatigue, sleep deprivation, and stress. Consequently, long hours working might be able to create negative social results.
To sum up, despite the fact that the countries which attempt to extend working hours have the highest global economy, people who work for a long time suffering from negative social consequences.
words (272)
