Topic of charity organisations

[yhjsaber]

Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are in great needs, while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country. Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is true that there are certain advantages of globalising the businesses of charity organisations. However, I believe it is better for these parties to cater for the needs of local people living in impoverished condition before offering support to residents of other countries.

Opponents of this may argue that utilising the combined efforts of charitable companies internationally is rather efficient in dealing with severe famine affecting many developing countries. For instance, the rates at which new born children survive in Africa are improving tremendously due to the increasing financial support provided by Red Cross and other international charitable parties. Besides, allowing charitable activities to be carried out at a global scale creates considerable amount of vaccines for various types of jobs across many disciplines, promoting the employment rate worldwide. As seen above, the merits of internationalising charitable actions are obvious.

However, I believe that the risks associated with a country ceaselessly providing aid to other countries cannot be underestimated. The action of Pakistan plays a vivid example here. This country donated all its military tents to China in an attempt to create more shelters for Chinese who suffered from the disastrous earthquake took place in 2008. As a result, an increasingly high number of poor citizens in Pakistan are forced to live in the streets where hygienic standards are extremely low, which subsequently deteriorates the health level of general public in this region. Therefore, it is clear that if charity organisations blindly offer financial aids to other countries without considering the needs of the local, letting these organisations continue with the trend of global charity would be detrimental to both the well-being of local residents and the development of a nation.

In conclusion, charitable organisations should decide whether or not they are capable of helping people of different nationalities without causing more problems to the host country. Thus, it is expedient for charitable parties to first concentrate on tackling the issues in their regions before reaching out to other nations.

[Flick]

Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are in great needs, while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country. Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is true that there are certain advantages of globalising the businesses of charity organisations. However, I believe it is better for these parties to cater to the needs of local people living in impoverished condition before offering support to residents of other countries.(<-- Very well put.)

Opponents of this may argue that utilising the combined efforts of charitable companies internationally is rather efficient in dealing with severe famine affecting many developing countries. For instance, the rates at which new born children survive in Africa are improving tremendously due to the increasing financial support provided by Red Cross and other international charitable parties. Besides, allowing charitable activities to be carried out on a global scale creates a considerable amount of opportunities for various types of jobs across many disciplines, improving the employment rate worldwide. As seen above, the merits of internationalising charitable actions are obvious.

However, I believe that the risks associated with a country ceaselessly providing aid to other countries cannot be underestimated. The actions of Pakistan supply a vivid example here. This country donated all its military tents to China in an attempt to create more shelters for Chinese who suffered from the disastrous earthquake that took place in 2008. As a result, an increasingly high number of poor citizens in Pakistan are forced to live on the streets where hygienic standards are extremely low, which subsequently deteriorates the health level of the general public in this region. Therefore, it is clear that, if charity organisations blindly offer financial aid to other countries without considering the needs of the local population, both the well-being of local residents and the development of a nation will be severely impacted.

In conclusion, charitable organisations should decide whether or not they are capable of helping people of different nationalities without causing more problems to the host country. Thus, it is expedient for charitable parties to first concentrate on tackling the issues in their own region before reaching out to other nations.

Really well argued. Great job!